Recognition, not invention

Standards

We don't ask the market to recognize a mark we invented. We map GATE to the frameworks your auditors and procurement teams already trust — and we're just as clear about what we don't claim.

The mapping

Where GATE meets the frameworks.

Agentic-trust requirements aren't ours to define alone — regulators and standards bodies are converging on the same demands: automatic logging, genuine human oversight, and an accountability lineage back to a person. GATE is built to produce exactly that evidence.

Standard & requirementHow GATE satisfies it
EU AI ActArticle 12 — record-keeping & automatic logging Every consequential action is written to a hash-chained record with timestamp, actor, content, and outcome. Logs are reconstructable after the fact and tamper-evident — altering a past entry breaks the chain visibly.
EU AI ActArticle 14 — human oversight A qualified human — never the submitter — holds, edits, or rejects each gated action, and their judgment is part of the record. Nothing consequential ships unsupervised; anything over a guardrail routes to a person by construction.
EU AI ActArticle 13 — transparency & documentation The sealed record documents each decision and its rationale, giving deployers the traceable basis the Act expects for high-risk systems.
ISO/IEC 42001AI management system The first AI management-system standard, increasingly a procurement precondition. GATE supplies the operational control and evidence layer an AIMS needs — earned-autonomy policy, guardrails, and an auditable decision trail.
NIST AI RMFGovern · Map · Measure · Manage GATE operationalizes the framework's accountability lineage: govern (gates & roles), map (scoped actions), measure (the scored trust ledger), manage (hard guardrails and one-click revert) — every action traceable to a responsible human.
What we do not claim

Honesty is the product. So is restraint.

A trust company that overstates its own compliance has disproved its entire premise in a sentence. So we draw the line plainly:

No blanket compliance claim

Mapping to a framework is not the same as certifying compliance with it. Whether the EU AI Act's high-risk obligations apply to your system depends on what that system does — credit or insurance decisioning on individuals is treated as high-risk; drafting sales outreach generally is not. GATE gives you high-risk-grade controls regardless; it does not, by itself, make a determination of your legal status.

We apply the rigor by choice

On our own installs and LoanCirrus's, we hold agents to high-risk-grade logging and oversight even where the law would ask for less — ahead of the Act's August 2, 2026 high-risk deadline, and in glass. That's a decision about how we operate, not a legal opinion about your obligations.

Get your own counsel

We'll tell you candidly where a GATE control helps you meet a requirement and where you still need a lawyer. We are a trust company, not your legal advisor — and saying so is part of being trustworthy.

Bring your framework. We'll map to it.

If your auditors or procurement team have a specific standard in hand, we'll show you exactly where GATE's record meets it — and where it doesn't.

Book a conversation How the record works